Furnished rentals in condominiums: what the “Le Meur” law actually changes
Why is this topic coming up again today?
Regulations governing furnished rentals continue to evolve, raising many questions among landlords.
Recently, certain provisions were reviewed by the Constitutional Council as part of a Priority Preliminary Ruling on Constitutionality (QPC), brought primarily by industry professionals.
Indeed, the concept of furnished rentals is at the center of many debates, and it is essential to fully understand the implications of these regulations.
On that occasion, information was provided regarding the conditions for implementing the so-called “Le Meur” law.
👉 The result: contrary to some interpretations that have been circulating, the reality is more nuanced.
What the rule says (and, more importantly, what it doesn’t say)
An idea quickly spread:
It would now be easier for a condominium association to ban furnished short-term rentals through a two-thirds majority vote.
In practice, this rule is not applied uniformly.
Here’s what you really need to remember:
- The two-thirds majority applies primarily to buildings whose bylaws stipulate exclusive residential use
- In the case of mixed-use properties (residential, professional, or commercial), any amendment to the regulations must be approved unanimously
- The rules governing the primary residence remain unchanged
- The 90-day rule for primary residences remains unchanged
In other words: the ability to prohibit furnished rentals is subject to certain conditions and is not applied across the board.
It is no longer easy to ban furnished units in condominiums.
Contrairement à ce qui a pu être rapporté :
It is no longer easy to ban furnished units in condominiums.
Reality is closely tied to:
- of the condominium bylaws,
- the nature of the building,
- and the use of the property.
Not all properties are therefore subject to the same level of stress.
The real issue: general meetings
Beyond the legal framework, the key issue remains how the condominium operates.
Decisions made at a general meeting can have lasting, or even irreversible, consequences.
Two key points to remember:
- Once adopted, an amendment to the regulations may significantly limit the possibilities for using the property
- Failing to participate in the vote (whether in person or by proxy) effectively amounts to accepting the decision, with no possibility of appeal
The general meeting therefore becomes a crucial moment for homeowners.
What this means in practical terms for a homeowner
This development does not result in a blanket ban.
Instead, it introduces a case-by-case approach, depending on:
- drafting the condominium rules
- the building type
- the type of use of the property (short-term or medium-term)
As a result, two similar properties may find themselves in different legal situations.
Our reading
This development confirms an underlying trend:
Regulations are becoming more detailed, more localized, and more dependent on the specific context of each building.
In this context, the issue is no longer solely economic.
Legal certainty is becoming a key factor in ensuring the long-term use of the property.
In other words, managing a property is no longer based solely on its profitability, but also on its ability to operate sustainably within a well-defined regulatory framework.
Conclusion
The issue is not a blanket ban on furnished rentals.
Rather, it is a matter of the rules becoming more complex, which underscores the importance of:
- a solid understanding of the legal framework,
- greater vigilance in condominiums,
- and structured management.
In this context, planning ahead becomes a key strategy for safeguarding your property over the long term.
🔎 Practical Information
At 2BeApart, we closely monitor these developments in order to adapt our operational strategies and ensure the security of the properties we manage.